This portfolio is a collection of my mechanical and aerospace design work. It covers academic research and industry projects, including manufacturing and test equipment.
Some of my best design work is directly on products released to the market; however, I am unable to share any pictures. The Product Design section describes the key points of each project.
Dyson-funded · Institute of Sound and Vibration Research
Noise Reduction of a High-Speed Fan
An experimental investigation into applying noise-reduction methods developed for flat plates to outlet guide vanes (OGVs) and a high-speed rotating fan, while measuring the resulting acoustic and aerodynamic tradeoffs.
9Modified OGV concepts developed
5OGVs manufactured and rig-tested
26082-T6 aluminum fan designs
3 dBNoise reduction in a frequency band
Porous
Slitted
Serrated
Representative OGV designs
The three mechanisms are shown on the same baseline geometry for direct comparison.
1 · Research question
Transfer three proven mechanisms to curved OGV/fan hardware
The research investigated whether leading-edge serrations and slits, or
porosity applied across a surface, could reduce noise when transferred from
flat-plate research to curved OGV airfoils while minimizing aerodynamic loss.
2 · Geometry challenge
Modify protected STEP geometry without a feature history
Dyson supplied solid-body geometry to protect intellectual property. The OGV
curvature and local angle change continuously along the span, so every cut had
to follow the local surface. After SolidWorks proved too slow for the required
iteration, I moved the work to Siemens NX and produced nine printable designs.
OGV design development
Nine concepts across three noise-reduction mechanisms
Two porous, three slitted and four serrated OGV concepts varied the geometry of
each mechanism so its acoustic effect and aerodynamic penalty could be tested.
Local reference planes
Cylindrical cutting bodies
Porosity · 2 concepts
Locally aligned cylindrical cuts
Equally spaced cylinders were constructed normal to local vane planes, patterned radially around all 17 vanes and subtracted from the baseline body. The fully porous design used 1 mm holes spaced 10 mm apart; the partial design used two rows of 2.5 mm holes. The openings allow flow from the high-pressure lower surface to the low-pressure upper surface.
Slits · 3 concepts
Projected geometry following the leading edge
Curves from a radial plane were projected onto the vane and then onto a local
tangent plane. The resulting profiles were thickened, patterned around the
OGV and subtracted. The three designs varied slit width from 1 to 1.5 mm and
slit length from 5 to 10 mm.
Serrations · 4 concepts
Sinusoidal edges varied by wavelength and amplitude
A sinusoidal curve was drawn on a plane tangent to the vane, thickened into a
cutting body and patterned around all vanes. The set compared 3, 5 and 10 mm
wavelengths at a 10 mm peak-to-peak amplitude, plus a half-amplitude variant.
Five test OGVs and the baseline. Two black parts were produced by FFF; three
gray parts by SLA.
Manufacture & rig testing
Five OGVs progressed from CAD to experiment
Serra-B and Slit-A were produced by fused-filament fabrication (FFF). I moved to stereolithography (SLA) for Porous-A, Serra-A and Serra-C because its smoother surface finish would help limit skin-friction drag. The FFF-printed OGVs were not reprinted in SLA after their tests showed no noise reduction.
Acoustic and aerodynamic data were collected from 2,000 to 7,000 rpm and at
several pressure differentials around the 4,400 rpm operating point. None of
the five OGVs produced a meaningful sound-power reduction against the baseline,
demonstrating that OGV interaction was not the dominant broadband noise source.
Evidence changed the project
The null result redirected the work toward the dominant source
Rather than ending with an unsuccessful OGV campaign, I extended the project to the fan itself, which was a known dominant noise source. Limited time meant I could manufacture only two fans, so I designed one with leading-edge serrations and one with trailing-edge serrations.
Leading-edge serrations
Trailing-edge serrations
Serrated fan concepts
Edge treatments were transferred from stationary OGVs to the rotating source.
Structural validation
ABAQUS analysis before committing to five-axis machining
Each fan required approximately one week of machining from a single block of
6082-T6 aluminum. Structural analysis therefore verified the most aggressive
serration geometry before material and machine time were committed.
Tetrahedral meshFine global seed reduced to 0.6 mm within the academic-license node limit.Boundary conditionsRadial centrifugal loading with the hub fully constrained.DeformationMaximum predicted displacement was 38 microns.Maximum stress197 MPa at the serration root, below the 250 MPa material yield strength.
Design case
The 10 mm peak-to-peak leading-edge serration was selected as the highest-stress geometry.
Load case
Analysis represented 150% of the centrifugal load at the 7,000 rpm test maximum.
Mesh convergence
1.5, 1.0 and 0.6 mm meshes converged to within 8 and 6 microns of maximum displacement.
Material
6082-T6 aluminum: 70 GPa Young's modulus, 0.33 Poisson's ratio and 2.7 g/cm³ density.
Five-axis manufacture & result
Complex geometry became testable metal hardware
The serrated geometry required five-axis CNC machining. Cutter failures and
machine errors forced several restarts because even small asymmetry could create
unpredictable vibration at speed.
The tested trailing-edge fan produced a 3 dB reduction in a frequency band, with peak reductions up to 8 dB. The acoustic benefit came with a 2.98% to 3.62% reduction in axial flow.
Manufactured serrated aluminum fan clamped on the five-axis CNC.
Research evidence
Complete MSc dissertation
The dissertation documents the CAD development, manufacture, structural
analysis, acoustic testing and aerodynamic comparison.
Racal Acoustics (INVISIO Communications) · Production engineering
Automated Microphone Membrane Application Station
A four-part robotic gluing and pneumatic membrane-placement process developed
to waterproof microphone housings while protecting acoustic performance and
eliminating the variation of the original manual operation.
40% → 98%Production yield
4×Faster than manual gluing
4Housings processed on each tray
25Pneumatic outlets in three rings
The problem
Waterproof the microphone without changing its acoustic response
An existing microphone needed thin membranes bonded directly to the front
and rear housings. Each seal required a circular adhesive bead followed by
accurate placement and controlled pressure around the complete membrane lip.
Manual gluing produced variable bead width and occasional blobs. Excess
adhesive could move away from the circular lip and across the membrane,
causing inconsistent frequency-response results during acoustic testing.
Rejected microphones then had to be broken apart so the internal assembly
could be salvaged while the housings had to be discarded, wasting labor
and production time.
The solution
Automate the process and develop customized tooling
I replaced the hand-gluing operation with a robot program and designed
removable four-part trays that locate the housings beneath the dispensing
needle. I then replaced the upward-facing vacuum jig with hand-held
vacuum/pressure stamps, a four-way pneumatic valve, UV curing and final
pressure testing.
The same tray remains with all four housings after gluing. The operator no
longer removes and flips each housing individually, reducing handling and
keeping every part in a known position throughout the process. The aim was
maximum consistency between operators, with every assembly remaining within
the required acceptance band.
Robotic adhesive dispensing
A repeatable circular path across four housings
The robot controlled the dispensing needle in three axes. It applied adhesive along the housing path, stopped dispensing and retraced the path to spread the glue evenly, then lifted clear of the housing and moved to the next one to repeat the process.
Original membrane process
Vacuum or off was not enough
The original fixture faced upward. An operator positioned a membrane with
tweezers, slowly flattened it against six vacuum holes, then pressed a glued
housing down onto it. Turning off the suction was expected to leave the
membrane attached to the housing.
Pressure was difficult to apply evenly around the seal. Adhesive was often
squeezed onto the fixture, allowing the membrane to remain stuck to the jig
instead of the housing. The six vacuum points also allowed wrinkles that could
alter the later acoustic response.
Redesigned membrane process
Vacuum, neutral and positive pressure
The new hand-held stamp uses vacuum to collect the membrane, neutral pressure
while it is brought onto the adhesive, and positive pressure to release it
deliberately onto the housing. This third state prevents the stamp from
depending on passive release.
A four-way valve selects the state. In its center position both supplies are
blocked, while the Dymax 5 relief valve protects the pneumatic source. In the
air and vacuum positions, the unused supply is redirected through the hidden
fourth port under the valve to atmosphere.
Manufactured front stamp with the Dymax 5 pneumatic source and four-way control
valve used for vacuum, neutral and positive-pressure operation.
Stamp geometry & internal channels
Front and rear tools, outside and inside
Both stamps combine a secure grip, alignment guides and a mechanical depth stop.
Internal channels divide one pneumatic connection into 25 outlets in three rings,
supporting the membrane more evenly than the original six-hole jig and reducing wrinkles.
Front stamp
Rear stamp
External tool geometryInterface-specific tools with the same operating principle.
Front cross-section
Rear cross-section
Distributed pneumatic channelsThe central passage divides into three outlet rings.
1
Knurled surface
Knurling across the body let the operator hold the tool securely with a light grip, preventing unwanted shaking and making membrane placement more consistent.
2
High-contrast contact face
The surface touching the membrane is printed black. The contrast makes it
immediately obvious whether a thin membrane is present and correctly located.
3
Three-ring flow distribution
Twenty-five outlets replace the original six vacuum holes, spreading support
across the membrane and sharply reducing wrinkles.
4
Parallel alignment guides
External legs keep the contact surface parallel to the adhesive ring so one
side cannot receive more pressure than the other.
5
Operator visibility
Gaps between the guide legs let the operator see the stamp approach and learn
the correct placement motion without obscuring the joint.
6
Mechanical depth stop
Guide height creates a mechanical stop, limiting the stamp to the experimentally established placement depth without squeezing adhesive across the membrane. Changing the offset by 0.1 mm could change yield by 15%, so the front and rear tools were tuned independently.
Built & implemented
Trial, manufacture and production release
The mechanical-stop height was established separately for the front and rear
housings through physical trials. Each tool had to press firmly enough to close
the complete adhesive ring without pushing material into the acoustic area.
The finished stamps were connected to the Dymax 5 through the four-way valve
and introduced with the robot trays, curing process and pressure verification.
The process was then adapted for additional microphone variants.
Outcome
Production yield increased from 40% to 98%.
Automated gluing was four times faster than manual operator gluing. The complete station made adhesive coverage, membrane pressure and release
repeatable while reducing acoustic rejects, material waste and rework.
3
Production Equipment · Industry
Fixtures shaped around the operator and the process
Production Jigs and Fixtures
3A
Microphone processing
Universal Demagnetizing Fixture
The requirement
Several microphone variants had to be held at a repeatable height above an
electromagnet. Each microphone sits in the black spring-contact tray shown
above the blue fixture in the production photograph. Spring force changes
the closed tray height between variants and also tries to push the tray back
out of the fixture.
Problem with the original jig
The earlier station used a latch to resist the spring force. Inserting or
removing a tray required one hand to operate the latch and a second to hold
the tray, slowing a highly repetitive production task.
The mechanism
I replaced the latch with an adjustable friction bridge. The operator pushes
the tray past light friction with one hand, and that same friction holds the
tray at a controlled field position. An indexed screw is adjusted once for
the microphone variant at the start of a production run and remains fixed
for the whole batch.
The outcome
The additively manufactured fixture became a faster, universal station for
multiple tray heights and was introduced at the supplier for production use.
Adjustable fixture CAD
The bridge accommodates several spring-contact tray heights while
preserving a consistent position above the electromagnet.
Production installation
The black spring-contact tray slides into the blue printed fixture above
the electromagnet; product information has been obscured.
3B
Roll-pin insertion
Repeatable Assembly from Awkward Manual Operations
Requirement
Assemble two components with two roll pins simultaneously using an existing hand press. The pins had to remain aligned with their holes throughout the stroke. The supplier variant bolts onto its press; the in-house variant clips onto ours.
Design response
The fixture separates the functions into a fixed base, a replaceable
alignment bridge and an upper press attachment. Steel guide rods pass
through the bridge to drive both pins into the suspension assembly.
Maintainability
The bridge contains the guide holes and is intentionally replaceable. If
those holes wear, alignment can be restored without remaking the entire jig.
Implementation
Most components were 3D printed, with steel used in the pin-driving load path. The supplier fixture was bolted to its hand press, while the in-house fixture clipped onto our press and located through the bed.
Supplier variant · bolted mounting
Supplier fixture CADBase, replaceable bridge and press attachment for the bolted variant.Printed supplier variantThe manufactured fixture and components for bolted mounting on the supplier's hand press.
In-house variant · clip-on mounting
Clip-on componentsThe in-house variant attaches to our press without bolting it down.Clipped onto our pressThe in-house tooling installed for production use.
4
Test Equipment · Industry
Adaptable long-duration durability testing
Life-Test Fixture
A maintainable, adjustable test platform for repeatedly flexing different product
components through programmable distances when existing equipment could not
reproduce the required long-duration loading.
The requirement
Adapt one fixture to multiple parts and flex distances
Products qualified for demanding service environments also require life testing
to demonstrate long-term mechanical durability. The rig had to accommodate
different components, mounting positions and flex distances while remaining
easy to repair after a very high number of cycles.
Adjustable actuation
The linear actuator mount can move laterally and vertically to align with
different test articles. Stroke distance is programmed electronically; when a
required position lies outside the actuator's available travel, its mounting
block can be relocated along the repeated hole pattern.
Maintainable structure
Sheet-metal plates are joined with replaceable corner brackets, through-bolts
and nuts rather than permanent joints. Black printed covers protect the exposed
bracket geometry. An electronics enclosure on the reverse side contains the
actuator power supply and programming connection.
Rigid but fully serviceable bolted sheet-metal structure
Adjustable actuator position in multiple axes
Programmable stroke for different flex requirements
Relocatable mounting block extends the usable test range
Complete test-rig CAD
Actuator, adjustable supports and protected bolted structure packaged into a
single maintainable fixture.
Built hardware
Designed for reconfiguration and repeated maintenance
The manufactured fixture uses the same adjustable actuator layout and bolted
panel construction shown in CAD. The selected photograph omits sensitive
product information while showing the production-scale structure and actuator.
Manufactured fixture with the linear actuator, support brackets and repeated
mounting positions visible.
Custom test development
Helmet Softliner Compression
Designed cyclic-compression testing for two helmet softliners, using a mechanical
roller to apply thousands of repeatable load cycles where standard equipment did
not reproduce the required condition.
5
Thermodynamic Research
BEng Aerospace Engineering · University of Surrey
Cooling-Fin Design for an Electric Ducted Fan
An independent academic study combining CAD, thermal analysis and aerodynamic CFD to balance motor cooling, drag and weight.
Initial working geometry A 1.071 m-long region, with a 1.27 m duct diameter and a 0.38 m motor diameter.
Electric propulsion · 2018
Use the support structure to remove heat
The E-Fan X demonstrator, developed by Airbus, Rolls-Royce and Siemens, proposed replacing one of a BAe 146 aircraft's four jet engines with a 2 MW electric motor. This university project used that concept as the context for a simplified cooling study.
Without the actual duct geometry, I simplified the working region to an annular tube and investigated motor-support struts used simultaneously as cooling fins. My model assumed a 1 MW motor and 30 kW of waste heat, distinct from the demonstrator specification. The design problem was to conduct heat into the fins, then transfer it to the passing air by convection without excessive flow resistance.
Thermodynamic trial
Establish the heat-transfer model
Heat conducts through the solid motor and fins, then passes into the moving air by convection. Early SimScale trials established the mesh, thermal interfaces and boundary conditions before refining the geometry.
Thermal-model development Geometry, mesh and temperature plots used to check the simulation setup.
Thermodynamic optimization
Compare fin geometry and spacing
I increased material near the motor and compared repeated fin arrangements. Symmetry sectors reduced computation while retaining the inlet velocity and pressure-outlet conditions; heat input scaled with the sector’s share of the full motor.
Repeated fin arrangements Left to right: symmetric sectors representing 8, 16 and 32 fins in the complete duct.
Large-model finding
Even the 32-fin configuration did not reach thermal equilibrium at nominal heating within the modeled 2,000 s. Fin-only cooling was not demonstrated for this large-motor case; another approach, such as liquid cooling, would need investigation.
A smaller reference model
I redirected the study to a 195 mm Schübeler EDF. With an assumed 500 W heat load, the report records equilibrium at 412 K for the baseline model.
Aerodynamic optimization
Reduce the cooling fins’ drag
I replaced the rectangular baseline with three streamlined airfoil-section variants of similar average thickness. Four design variants were compared for viscous and pressure drag, with further thermal checks around the thinner leading and trailing edges.
Geometry and thermal responseAirfoil-section CAD and a qualitative temperature field. The original composite is shown without cropping its legend.
Four CFD design variants: simulated drag forces in the −y direction.
Design
Viscous (N)
Pressure (N)
Reported total (N)
D5.1
8.5
17.2
25.7
D5.2 Lowest reported
6.2
9.3
15.8
D5.3
8.3
11.7
20.0
D5.4
7.9
8.3
16.2
Original report values. D5.2’s components sum to 15.5 N; its reported total is 15.8 N.
The study established a comparative CFD workflow for balancing conduction, convection and drag. It did not provide an experimentally validated production cooling system.
6
Formula Student
Aerodynamic design · BEng Aerospace Engineering · University of Surrey
Formula Student Rear-Wing Development
A three-element rear wing developed through 28 CAD and CFD
iterations for the University of Surrey Formula Student car. The team placed fifth
overall in the UK competition.
28Aerodynamic design iterations
130 NRequired downforce at 12 m/s
≈ 180 NFinal isolated-wing downforce
5thOverall in the UK competition
Design requirements
Produce a measurable net benefit within Formula Student constraints
The rear wing had to exceed 130 N downforce at 12 m/s, cost no more than £660,
remain below 8 kg excluding DRS and swan-neck mounts, and achieve a high-quality
surface finish while satisfying the rulebook's working-volume, edge-radius,
strength and stability requirements.
Why three elements
The Formula Student problem was not a scaled Formula 1 problem
A comparison with Formula 1 showed that the Formula Student working volume was
205% larger while its typical cornering speed was far lower. The wing therefore
had to be developed for this operating point instead of copying a two-element
Formula 1 arrangement.
143 N
Single element
Flow separated at 16° incidence and the concept remained far below target.
280 N
Stacked double wing
Interference between the two layers increased the drag penalty and still missed the requirement.
3≈ 180 N
Three-element B2
Attached flow, 97 N drag and aerodynamic efficiency of 1.8 at the 12 m/s design condition.
Iterative workflow
Geometry, numerical force data and flow visualization
Airfoil coordinates were transformed in Excel using scale, rotation and
translation, then used to build the three-dimensional wing geometry in CATIA.
Each iteration received a fine SimScale mesh and was evaluated at 12 m/s.
Pressure and viscous forces were resolved into downforce and drag, then compared
with the previous version. Autodesk Flow Design visualizations showed separation,
attachment and upwash, guiding position, chord and incidence changes of only a
few millimeters or degrees at a time.
Airfoil iteration set
Candidate geometries developed and compared during the optimization process.
Separated flow · B6
Attached flow · final B2
Flow visualization directed the iteration
Separation around B6 compared with attached flow around the selected B2 geometry.
CFD comparison
Downforce, drag and aerodynamic efficiency across the B-series iterations.
Final aerodynamic selection
Fifty newtons beyond the original target
B2 was selected because it combined approximately 180 N of downforce with
97 N of drag and visibly strong flow attachment. Designs producing more force
carried much larger drag penalties and lower aerodynamic efficiency.
Moving from the earlier 80 N configuration to B2 increased downforce by about
100 N and exceeded the 130 N requirement by 50 N. Sharing its main airfoil
section with the front wing also reduced the number of manufacturing molds.
Team integration
Aerodynamic geometry prepared for CFRP manufacture
The team manufacturing concept separated each airfoil into upper, lower and
corrugated internal sections for prepreg carbon-fiber construction. Structural
detailing and swan-neck mounting were completed by other team contributors;
these images show how my aerodynamic surfaces entered the wider assembly.
Upper, lower and corrugated-section mold strategy.Team-developed exploded CFRP assembly.
Project evidence
CFD history and Critical Design Review
The linked SimScale project shows the digital iteration history; the team CDR
records the requirements, CFD method, results and manufacturing proposal.
Selected product development and supporting manufacturing experience
Product Design
Key design contributions to released hardware and other products. Proprietary customer-product imagery is not shown.
Product redesign · Industry
Flagship Ruggedized Headset
Led the headset redesign (through SolidWorks) addressing seven failure modes behind a 25% reject
rate. The work combined root-cause investigation, DFM and production changes
across 35 plastic and rubber injection-molded components, saving tens of
thousands of pounds and improving production-tool life.
Root-cause investigation across product and process failures
Injection-molded plastic and rubber part redesign
Design reviews, tolerancing and supplier manufacture
Structural redesign · Validation
Boom-Arm Stiffness
Redesigned a headset boom-arm system to increase stiffness fourfold and remove
unwanted movement in a severe vibration environment. The revised hardware was
qualified through MIL-STD-810G vibration and ingress testing.
Product development · Creo/Windchill
Respirator Cables & Throat Microphones
Developed four headset-to-respirator cable assemblies and two throat microphones
from CAD through manufacture and mass-production qualification, including salt-
fog, thermal and cable-bend testing.
Sustainable products · Internship
Biodegradable Products & Mold Tooling
At Ecoinno, designed meal trays, coffee capsules and bottles in Siemens NX, then
designed the wet molds used to collect recycled composite material and the heat-
press tools used to form and finish each product.
Manufacturing & quality
Sheet-Metal Production Engineering
Planned end-to-end manufacturing routes for aerospace and defense assemblies,
generated FAIR documentation, verified tolerances with CMM and manual metrology,
and led NCR/CAR root-cause containment. Nesting and routing improvements reduced
waste, cost and energy use.